This post is a part of my CLIMATE CONUNDRUM Series - Engineers screwed the environment. Why are we letting them lead the unscrewing? - India Renewable Energy Consulting – Solar, Biomass, Wind, Cleantech
Select Page

This post is a part of my CLIMATE CONUNDRUM Series. See all posts in this series here

Engineers screwed the environment. Why are we letting them lead the unscrewing?

Top management consulting experts for Bio-energy, EV, Solar, Green Hydrogen

The title is deliberately provocative, but let me explain.

The year is 1800. Pre industrial world. Global population: 1 billion (an eighth of what it is today)

Here's more about EAI

climate tech image India's first climate tech consulting firm

climate tech image We work across entire climate tech spectrum

climate tech imageOur specialty focus areas include bio-energy, e-mobility, solar & green hydrogen

climate tech image Gateway 2 India from EAI helps international firms enter Indian climate tech market

Deep dive into our work

The engineers, as we know them today, did not exist.

The world emitted about 30 million tons of CO2.

Engineers & engineering happened at the start of industrial revolution #1, which accelerated from 1800.

Two hundred and twenty years later, we have annual emissions of about 50 billion tons of CO2 equivalent – 1600 times what it was in 1800, while the population had grown only by 8 times. That is, GHG emissions rose two hundred fold per capita.

“Engineered” solutions are almost certainly responsible for most, if not all of this tremendous per capita increase.

While the whole world respects and admires engineers because they have made our lives incredibly comfortable and enriching, very few of these engineers gave any thought to the environment, and very few still do.

For engineers, their solutions come first.

If that is the case, shouldn’t it be non-engineers who lead the transition to a low carbon economy?

Of course, engineers will play a crucial role in this transition, as we live in a world made by them, but should they LEAD the low carbon transition movement?

Or, for the end result to be truly sustainable, should this movement be led by others who perhaps APPRECIATE environment far better than engineers – sociologists, philosophers, behavioural scientists, artists (hopefully not economists, and not certainly management guys, god, not THEM!)

What are your thoughts?

See my LinkedIn post on this topic

About Narasimhan Santhanam (Narsi)

Narsi, a Director at EAI, Co-founded one of India's first climate tech consulting firm in 2008.

Since then, he has assisted over 250 Indian and International firms, across many climate tech domain Solar, Bio-energy, Green hydrogen, E-Mobility, Green Chemicals.

Narsi works closely with senior and top management corporates and helps then devise strategy and go-to-market plans to benefit from the fast growing Indian Climate tech market.


Copyright © 2024 EAI. All rights reserved.